Challenging the NID DAT 2018 BDes Exam: Identifying and Addressing Errors
The National Institute of Design (NID) conducted the Design Admissions Test (DAT) 2018 for Bachelor of Design (BDes) aspirants. This comprehensive test covers a myriad of topics and concepts crucial for design aspirants. However, like many other standardized tests, the NID DAT 2018 BDes exam did not escape scrutiny as several questions were found to have errors. In this article, we will explore some of the most disputed questions and the potential impacts of these errors on the test-takers.
Q. 61: Absorption Spectrum vs Abrupt Spectrum
One of the most widely discussed errors in the NID DAT 2018 BDes exam was found in Question 61. The correct option marked by the examiners as B referred to abruption spectrum. However, many students and experts argue that the correct term should have been absorption spectrum. This discrepancy in terminology led to significant confusion among test-takers. Many individuals who selected option B were mistakenly marked incorrect, thereby affecting their final scores.
The Impact of the Error
Due to the error in Question 61, numerous candidates did not choose the correct answer, resulting in incorrect responses. This error not only affected the fairness of the exam but also created a sense of dissatisfaction among the candidates who felt that the question was flawed and inaccurately graded.
Student Feedback and Expert Perspective
According to Ashish Mohite, a prominent figure in the design community, the error in Question 61 is indicative of a broader issue in the preparation and oversight of such large-scale standardized tests. He emphasized the need for rigorous review and verification of questions before the final examination.
Additional Errors in the NID DAT 2018 BDes Exam
Several other questions in the NID DAT 2018 BDes exam were also flagged for potential errors. These issues range from technical inaccuracies in multiple-choice questions to design-oriented puzzles that seemed to favor certain interpretations over others.
Triangle-Star Question
One of the questions that sparked considerable discussion was the triangle-star question. The ambiguous nature of this question left many puzzled about the correct answer. Some argued that the earth's rotation could provide a clue, while others believed that the pattern of movement (clockwise vs. anti-clockwise) was the key to solving the puzzle. This question exemplifies the importance of clear and unambiguous questioning in standardized exams.
Earth Rotation and Pattern Recognition
Another point of contention was the question related to earth's rotation and pattern recognition. Many students felt that the problem was not well-defined and led to different interpretations, making it challenging to ascertain a single correct answer. This issue highlights the necessity for careful crafting of questions to ensure that they are logical and comprehensible to all test-takers.
Conclusion and Future Implications
The errors in the NID DAT 2018 BDes exam serve as a critical reminder of the need for meticulous preparation and review processes in standardized tests. Aspiring design students and educators must be vigilant and prepared to challenge and seek clarity when faced with ambiguities in exams. Future revisions of the exam should focus on enhancing the clarity and accuracy of questions to ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process.
Key Takeaways:
The importance of clarity and accuracy in exam questions The impact of even small errors on test-takers' scores The need for rigorous review and verification processes