Should You Opt for the 2016 or 2017 MacBook Pro 13”?
When choosing between the 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pro models, particularly in terms of the 256GB capacity without a Touch Bar, the decision begins to lean towards understanding the performance and hardware differences. This guide aims to provide insights into the trade-offs and help you make an informed choice based on your needs and budget.
The Critical Hardware Differences
The most significant difference lies in the storage speed and the central processing architecture. The 2017 model features a 7th generation chip architecture, which is said to be about 20-32% faster than the 2016 model, which uses 6th generation architecture. However, the 2016 model boasts faster SSD (Solid State Drive) speeds.
Another important factor is that the 2017 model ships with the Touch Bar, which enhances usability and adds a layer of convenience. This feature comes at a slight premium in terms of cost and size, but it can be a game-changer for many users.
Performance Comparisons and User Experiences
User experiences have shown that in day-to-day tasks, the difference in performance might not be as stark as the benchmark figures suggest. My personal experience with a 2.0GHz i3 2016 MacBook Pro has been very positive, with speed and ease of use being almost identical to a 3.0GHz i7 MacBook Pro from a previous model. The new model, the 2017 MacBook Pro, offers a remarkable feature: it is lighter and the large trackpad can make a noticeable difference in usability for certain tasks. Specifically, the improved keyboard design, though, is recommended to be used with a thin plastic not silicone keyboard cover to avoid debris getting stuck in the key gaps.
Economic and Budget Considerations
If cost is a significant factor, the 2016 model with a 256GB SSD and more affordable pricing poses a compelling alternative. Despite the 2017 model being more powerful in terms of performance, there is still a significant price gap, and the 2016 model can still deliver great performance. Moreover, in my experience, the speed difference might not be as noticeable in everyday tasks, and the 2016 model can still handle most common user requirements with ease.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Ultimately, the decision boils down to your budgetary requirements and the priority you place on the latest features and performance improvements. If budget is not a constraint and you can afford the 2017 model, it is undoubtedly the superior choice. However, for those looking for a cost-effective solution without compromising on day-to-day performance, the 2016 model with faster SSD speeds remains a solid option. Consider your specific needs, and you will likely find the model that best suits your requirements.