Choosing Between the Avenger 220 Street and the Thunderbird 350: A Comprehensive Guide
When it comes to choosing between the Avenger 220 Street and the Thunderbird 350, there are a number of factors to consider, including overall ownership experience, maintenance costs, handling, and comfort. This article aims to provide a detailed comparison of these two bikes to help you make the best decision.
Overall Ownership Experience
One key factor to consider is the overall ownership experience. A user with extensive experience with Royal Enfields and the Avenger 220 Street shares a positive review, stating that the Avenger 220 Street offers a better overall experience. This user has owned a RE350 (Royal Enfield Classic 350) for six years and now owns an Avenger 220 since February 2011, with 58,000 trouble-free kilometers under the bike's belt.
Maintenance and Cost
Maintenance is another important consideration. The user notes that Royal Enfield bikes, while offering stability, power, and comfort, are excessively overpriced. The costs related to maintenance and technology add up, detracting from the overall value for money. The Avenger 220 Street, on the other hand, is described by this user as offering better technology and less expensive maintenance. Bajaj, in this case, is mentioned to win in terms of cost effectiveness and ease of maintenance.
Comfort and Handling
The level of comfort and handling also vary between these two bikes. Some users prefer the Avenger 220 Street for its light weight and cruiser-like handling, which is particularly advantageous in heavy traffic. Conversely, the Thunderbird 350 offers better control and balance, even at low speeds, though some find it challenging due to its weight.
Mountains and Ghats
For mountainous terrains and climates (such as the Ghats), the Royal Enfield Street offers an advantage with its superior torque. This is because the Royal Enfield provides more torque, making it easier to navigate steep and winding roads. The bike is also capable of carrying more weight, which is advantageous for long trips with saddle bags or carriers.
Service and Road Conditions
Finally, the serviceability on the road is another critical factor. Both bikes offer reasonable support from local mechanics, but the Avenger 220 Street is noted as having more available assistance. However, learning as much as possible about bike maintenance can help you resolve issues independently.
In conclusion, while both the Avenger 220 Street and the Thunderbird 350 have their strengths, the decision ultimately depends on your specific needs, whether you prioritize maintenance costs, comfort, or specific riding conditions.
Key Takeaways:
Overall Ownership Experience: Avenger 220 Street offers a better ownership experience with less trouble and better technology. Maintenance and Cost: Bajaj (represented by the Avenger 220 Street) is more cost-effective with lower monthly expenses. Comfort and Handling: Avenger 220 Street is better suited for city rides and heavy traffic, while Thunderbird 350 offers better control and balance at low speeds. Mountains and Ghats: Royal Enfield (Thunderbird 350) is better for mountainous terrains due to its superior torque. Service and Road Conditions: Avenger 220 Street might offer more roadside assistance, but knowledge is critical for independent troubleshooting.