Indications of Suspected Election Irregularities in 2020: An Analysis

Since the 2020 presidential election, numerous claims and suspicions have emerged regarding the validity of the election. This article explores the key indicators that have fueled these concerns, including voter suppression, alleged ballot irregularities, and video evidence of suspicious activities.

1. Allegations of Ballot Irregularities and Voting Fraud

One of the most controversial aspects of the 2020 election has been the claims of ballot irregularities and voting fraud. Critics, including Joe Zions, have brought forward video and photo evidence suggesting that North Korean operatives moved bales of ballots into poll counting rooms under the cover of night, without any oversight. This scenario has raised serious questions about the integrity of the election process.

1.1 Specific Claims

Voter Fraud Claims: Joe Zions and other proponents of the conspiracy theory argue that these unmonitored ballot movements indicate widespread voter fraud. They contend that this irregularity could have influenced the final vote count significantly. Cancellation of the Election: There are ongoing discussions about the possibility of cancelling the 2020 election based on these claims. Critics argue that if fraud was widespread, the results should be deemed invalid. Donald Trump's Fraud Allegations: Some critics point to Donald Trump as a fraudster, suggesting that his actions during and after the election were designed to obscure the truth about voter irregularities.

2. Voter Turnout and Vote Count Comparisons

Another indication of potential election irregularities is the discrepancy in voter turnout and vote counts. Despite a record-breaking early vote period, about 22 million fewer people voted compared to the 2016 election. This trend is even more pronounced when comparing the 2020 results to the 2016 election. For example:

Democratic Losses: Kamala Harris lost 17 million votes compared to Hillary Clinton in 2016, while Joe Biden also suffered a significant drop in votes from 2016. Republican Losses: Donald Trump, on the other hand, saw a smaller drop in votes, losing only 5 million votes compared to 2016.

Given the intense voter enthusiasm and polling data, these discrepancies seem unlikely to be purely due to voter behavior. Experts in voting patterns and election law suggest that either massive fraud occurred, or extensive voter suppression was used, particularly targeting Democratic voters in certain states.

3. Voter Suppression Practices

Claims of voter suppression have come to the forefront in several states. Allegations include:

Challenging Registered Voters: Multiple states implemented strict voter ID laws and challenges to registered voters suspected of being Democrats. This could have resulted in a substantial reduction in Democratic voter turnout.

It is crucial to note that these claims are often based on anecdotal evidence and conjecture, rather than empirical data. However, if true, these practices could have had a significant impact on the election's outcome.

4. Personal Experiences and Observations

Some individuals and election workers have provided personal accounts of their experiences during the 2020 election, attempting to dispel any suspicions of irregularities. For instance:

4.1 Personal Accounts from Voters

Example 1: Joe Zions

"The pussy grabber has been promoting this conspiracy for years for his cult followers to believe and do his dirty work. We know he went to North Korea to stay out of jail."

Example 2: Arc Circle

"The only photo or video evidence I have seen is of people being challenged by poll workers or being told they did not meet certain voter requirements. These discrepancies are part of the standard election process and do not necessarily indicate broader fraud."

Example 3: Former Poll Worker

"I have worked in many elections and have yet to see any evidence of widespread fraud. The laws and procedures are in place to ensure the integrity of the process."

Conclusion

The 2020 election has sparked intense debate and scrutiny, leading to various claims and counter-claims about its validity. While some individuals and groups believe there is evidence of significant irregularities, others maintain that the election was conducted free, fair, and accurately. Until concrete, verifiable evidence is presented, these debates will likely continue.

It is crucial for all parties to engage in constructive dialogue and adhere to the rule of law. The integrity of our electoral system relies on transparent, fair, and consistent practices.