Is PUBG Mobile Scamming Players with Microtransactions and Crates?

Is PUBG Mobile scamming its players in the name of microtransactions and crate systems? Many players argue that the game manipulates the odds to favor those who spend real money on in-game items, ultimately exploiting their desire for exclusive content. This article dives into the evolution of microtransactions in PUBG Mobile, examining how the game has changed over the years, and if these changes qualify as a scam.

PUBG Mobile's Early Days (2018)

When PUBG Mobile was born in 2018, it quickly became popular due to its unique and addictive gameplay. Initially, microtransactions were not as common, offering crates that could either be earned for free or purchased using BP (Battle Point) or UC (Uniform Currency) in-game purchase currency. BP crates contained generic items that could be found on the ground in the game, while UC crates offered rare and popular items.

The Rise of Microtransactions (2019)

By 2019, PUBG Mobile had gained significant popularity. The crate system expanded, and Royale Pass was introduced at a surprisingly affordable price of 9 UC. Crates became more diverse and expensive, but the random chance of winning impressive items like Bling sets and Rugged Orange skins persisted. This period saw many players getting the best items primarily through crates, which were easier to obtain through UC purchases.

Increased Greed and Manipulation (2020)

In 2020, PUBG Mobile became more exploitative. The company noticed that even players not spending real money were obtaining high-quality skins and outfits, which frustrated those who were actively spending. To address this, PUBG added a milestone for good items, guaranteeing a legendary item every 10 crates. However, this guarantee came with an adjustment - players now had to purchase 3–4 crates to obtain one legendary item. Additionally, the introduction of stickers further reduced the chances of receiving the desired items.

Ambiguous Free-to-Play Elements (2021)

In 2021, PUBG introduced a range of upgradable skins and guns, leading many to pour significant amounts of real money into the game. To further monetize, they introduced an Amazon subscription that did not provide tangible rewards, merely exclusive items and some free UC and skins. This strategy seemed to reinforce the idea that in-game spending was necessary to remain competitive.

Decline and Continued Exploitation (2022–2023)

PUBG's popularity began to decline in 2022 and 2023. However, YouTubers continued to pour money into the game, despite the growing tension among players. The introduction of scope, suppressor, and muzzle skins that could only be attached to specific weapons in crates made these items nearly impossible to obtain. The guaranteed legendary item per 10 crates was scrapped, and players now had to open 50–60 crates to potentially obtain one good skin, clearly indicating a shift towards increased exploitation.

Conclusion: PUBG Mobile as a Scam?

Yes, many players and critics believe that PUBG Mobile manipulates the odds and system to favor those who spend real money. The game's use of microtransactions and crates, along with the landscape of in-game purchases, has created a problematic ecosystem where genuine players are increasingly frustrated by the odds stacked against them. The collaboration between Playstore and PUBG Mobile also raises questions about potential collusion and exploitation of player behavior.

In summary, PUBG Mobile's approach to player engagement and in-game purchases has raised many concerns about fair play and transparency. As the competition in the genre intensifies, understanding and addressing these issues could be crucial for maintaining player satisfaction and the longevity of the game.