Promoting Peaceful Discourse on the Internet: Why Positive Comments Alone Are Not Enough

Is it truly sufficient to only comment on internet content in positive ways in order to promote peaceful discourse? While the idea sounds appealing, there are critical reasons why it is not an optimal solution. This article will explore the limitations of this approach and argue for a balanced and nuanced method of communication.

The Extremity of the Proposal

The proposal to solely comment in positive ways is indeed too extreme. I stand as a moderationist, advocating for a balanced approach to online communication. The question does not specify whether this positive engagement is self-regulated or regulated by social or technical means. While I would not mind an internet regime that is approximately 80% positive, I would prioritize the quality and importance of the content being communicated.

I also believe that such a principle should be secondary to the educational opportunities and resources that help individuals develop their communication skills. Social norms that define desirable qualities in good communication do not infringe on any rights or compromise the freedom of speech.

The Risks of Excessive Positivity

Social norms that mandate only positive comments can be seen as a form of tone policing and violate various free speech laws. It limits the scope of civil dialogue and discourages critiques and meaningful discussions. Critiques are necessary to identify and correct mistakes, while questions can spark valuable conversations. Platforms like Quora exemplify how questions and discussions lead to meaningful interactions.

Restricting comments to merely positive interactions is akin to asking a women's rights activist to calm down. We cannot restrict our comments to mere agreements, as this hinders learning and growth. When we exclude the possibility of constructive criticism and counterarguments, we miss essential opportunities for improvement and development. People need to be able to fail and learn from those failures in order to succeed and grow.

Encouraging a Balanced Approach

Instead of solely commenting in positive ways, a more balanced approach could embrace both positive and negative feedback. This approach should focus on constructive comments that are respectful, insightful, and aimed at fostering understanding and improvement. Constructive criticism does not have to be negative; it can serve as a tool for growth and positive change.

Critiques should be delivered in a respectful and empathetic manner. They should be focused on the ideas or actions, rather than on individuals. Similarly, questions can serve as a means to initiate discussions and encourage deeper connections. By balancing positive and constructive elements, we can create a fertile environment for meaningful conversations and peaceful discourse.

Conclusion

While the idea of promoting peaceful discourse through positive comments is a laudable goal, it is not sufficient on its own. A more holistic approach that includes both positive and constructive feedback is necessary to create an internet community that values truth, understanding, and growth. By fostering a culture of thoughtful engagement and respectful communication, we can achieve truly Peaceful Discourse.