The Accusations Against Narendra Modi: Digital Camera and Email Access in 1987/88

In recent years, there have been accusations made against Narendra Modi regarding his access to digital cameras and email around 1987/88. These claims have sparked a lot of debate and confusion. It is important to examine the historical context and available evidence to provide a reasonable perspective on these accusations.

Historical Context and Evidence

Firstly, the claim that Narendra Modi had a digital camera and access to email around 1987/88 has been debunked by factual evidence. The Internet was not widely accessible in India until 1995, and the first commercially available digital camera, the Kodak DCS 100, was launched in 1991. Given that, it is highly unlikely that Modi had such technology in the early 1980s.

Modi has been accused of having these technologies due to allegations that he was gifted a digital camera by Nathuram Godse, who is known for assassinating Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Critics point to this as evidence of Modi having access to modern technology earlier than expected. However, this claim is speculative and lacks concrete evidence.

Speculation and Claims

There is a school of thought that suggests that Modi may have been privy to certain technologies due to his connections within the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party). Some claim that BJP offices had a special network or secret labs where such advanced technologies could have been developed. However, these claims are largely based on speculation and are not supported by any concrete evidence.

J. Jayalalithaa, a critic of Modi, points out that if BJP had a special network or secret labs, the information would not be public. As of now, there is no evidence to support such claims.

Fact-Checking and Conclusion

Upon fact-checking, it is evident that India did not have widespread Internet access until 1995. The existence of ERNET, an Indian research and education computer network, does not necessarily mean that individuals within the BJP had access to email or digital cameras. The cost of the Kodak DCS 100 was over 20,000 dollars, making it an unaffordable luxury for those of Modi's financial status at the time.

Moreover, the claim that Modi was gifted a digital camera seems unlikely when considering the era and the lack of concrete evidence. Criticism of Modi on these grounds often stems from a lack of understanding or selective memories of history.

It is crucial to base discussions and accusations on verifiable facts rather than speculative claims. Modi's statements and actions deserve scrutiny, and any allegations should be supported by solid evidence to avoid spreading misinformation.