The Luminosity of Luminous Hands: Timex Indiglo vs. Traditional Lume
Whether you're a night runner, a clock collector, or simply someone who values the convenience of a visible watch face in the dark, the choice between luminous hands and backlit displays can be a crucial one. This article delves into the longevity and effectiveness of traditional luminous hands, specifically comparing them to the well-known Timex Indiglo and the renowned Seiko lume.
Understanding Luminous Hands
Have you ever noticed the glow on the hands and markers of your wristwatch in the dark? This glow is provided by a substance known as lume, which is often a type of paint or coating containing a radioactive material. This lume, when exposed to light, absorbs and stores energy, then emits it over time, creating a visible glow in the absence of light. The duration and intensity of this glow can vary widely depending on the substance used and the conditions under which the watch is stored.
The Longevity of Luminous Hands
Timex, a well-known brand, is famous for its Indiglo technology, a form of glow-in-the-dark hands and markers. However, as a long-time user and enthusiast of night-time activities, I have observed that the glow from these Indiglo hands can fade significantly after just a few years of use.
Seiko, on the other hand, has its own proprietary lume, which is widely considered the best in the industry. Even when this lume is dimmed after a few hours, it can still emit a visible glow in complete darkness for up to 8 hours, though faintly. This longevity is a significant advantage over Timex Indiglo, which can lose its glow even with minimal use over the years.
Timex Indiglo vs. Seiko Lume
My experience with Timex Indiglo is a compelling case study. As a regular night-time runner, I used the Indiglo hands for around 5 seconds during each run, about 5 times per run, and ran only 2-3 times a week. Despite this minimal use, the Indiglo glow began to fade after just 2-3 years. It's worth noting that the battery life for these watches is much longer; the Indiglo only seems to be the component that degrades over time.
This has been a consistent issue across five of my Ironman Timex watches, each of which exhibited the same pattern of gradual glow loss. After a couple of years, the Indiglo hands were no longer a reliable indicator of time in the dark, making them less useful for time-sensitive nighttime activities.
Alternatives to Indiglo and Lume
For those who value the performance of a luminous watch but are wary of the potential short lifespan of Indiglo, there are other options. One such alternative is tritium tubes, a highly radioactive substance that can emit light for longer periods than lume. However, tritium tubes also have limitations. They have a half-life of 12 years, which means that the glow will halve in brightness over this period. Moreover, tritium-watch components like hands and bezels containing inlaid tritium may not be replaceable, and original parts may no longer be available from the manufacturer. This makes tritium watches a less sustainable investment for anyone planning to keep a watch for a long time.
For instance, I had a Marathon Navigator with tritium tubes, and while it was still brightly luminescent, I was not prepared to replace the tritium hands and bezels after about 5 years of use.
Conclusion
For those who are looking for a reliable form of nighttime readability, traditional luminous hands, like those found in Seiko watches, offer a practical and durable solution. While Indiglo and tritium tubes can be attractive for their initial brightness, the potential for degradation over time and the limited lifespan of these technologies may outweigh the initial allure for many users.
Therefore, if you're a night runner or an enthusiasts who counts on your watch for nighttime activities, Seiko lume or even a simple press-button Casio watch with large digits might be more suitable options. As with any investment, it's important to consider the potential long-term usage and the reliability of the technology you choose to rely on in the dark.