The Unspoken Truth: Instances of Soldiers Refusing to Board Helicopters in the Vietnam War

Many veterans of the Vietnam War, like myself, have never encountered a situation where a soldier refused to board a helicopter during a patrol. However, it is important to acknowledge that while such instances may be rare, they do occur. This article delves into the experiences of soldiers, the psychological strains faced, and the ethical considerations that often come into play.

The Soldier's Perspective

During my tenure in the Vietnam War, I served in two tours, initially as a troop carrier pilot in slicks (troop-carrying helicopters) and later as a gunner in attack helicopters. My six-month tours left me with a profound understanding of the operational dynamics and the camaraderie among soldiers. Helicopter transport was a crucial part of our daily routine, and rarely did we encounter resistance from troops boarding the aircraft. When we were on the ground, preparation was meticulous, and it was a team effort to ensure everyone was safely and efficiently loaded into the helicopter. However, whispers and anecdotes from fellow soldiers suggest that there may have been instances when troops refused to board for various reasons.

Psychological Strains and the Weight of Courage

Courage is like a savings account; one can only withdraw from it so much before it depletes. In the intense and often dangerous environment of the Vietnam War, the psychological strain on soldiers was immense. A single traumatic experience could drastically impact an individual's mental well-being, and some may have felt the physical and emotional burden too much to bear. Refusal to board a helicopter could have been a manifestation of deep-seated trauma or the recognition that they were too taxed to continue.

Instances of Refusal

While I have never seen or heard of a soldier who outright refused to go on a patrol, there are instances documented where troops did show reluctance. In complex operations, soldiers might have hesitated to board due to fear, physical exhaustion, or mental strain. It is important to consider these situations with empathy, as these are moments of vulnerability in the lives of those who volunteered to serve. Some soldiers may have chosen to stay behind to care for comrades or to ensure mission readiness, even if it meant personal risk.

The Ethical Considerations

From an ethical standpoint, a soldier's decision to stay on the ground during a patrol is a significant one. It is crucial to respect the personal choices of soldiers who may have decided to remain on the ground for their own safety or to assist their peers. Each soldier in the unit played a critical role, and decisions made in the field could have long-lasting consequences. Acknowledging and respecting these choices is an essential aspect of maintaining the integrity of the service.

Aftermath and Consolation

Upon returning from the war, I did not harbor any animosity towards my friends who had become teachers or sought deferments due to personal circumstances. I was merely happy that they had avoided the harrowing experiences I faced. The experience of the war had changed us all, and for some, the decision to stay on the ground or take different paths was a testament to their resilience and the complex nature of serving in a conflict zone. These decisions were not without their consequences, and understanding and respecting them is part of the ongoing narrative of military service.

Conclusion

The Vietnam War was a period of immense challenge and trauma for many soldiers. While the atmosphere of the battlefield was one of unity and camaraderie, personal choices were often guided by the weight of courage and the unspoken burdens of war. Acknowledging these instances of refusal and understanding the complex factors that drove these decisions is a crucial step in honoring the service and sacrifices of all those who have served.