Why Closed-Source Software Needs to Be Open-Source
As a digital content creator, software engineer, and advocate for transparency, the idea of certain pieces of software being closed-source often sparks a discussion about the benefits and drawbacks of open-source software (FOSS). I am particularly passionate about several pieces of closed-source software that I believe desperately require the benefits that would come from being open-source.
Popular Software Deserving Open-Source Transformation
One of the software packages near and dear to my heart is Adobe Applications, which includes favorites like Photoshop, Lightroom, and Illustrator. As a digital content creator, these tools have been essential in my work, but the lack of support for Linux platforms can be a significant drawback. Many users share my sentiment, and the transition to open-source could exponentially increase the user base and contribute to a vibrant, diverse community of developers and enthusiasts.
Powerful Tools That Deserve Open-Source
Other software that I believe should be open-source include:
Microsoft C Compiler: This is a robust, versatile tool that significantly enhances development capabilities. Ideally, it could function as a bridge to open-source, paving a path for more accessible and adaptable development environments. Oracle Database and MemSQL: The lack of an open-source general-purpose database that caters to a broad spectrum of use cases is a significant gap. The proprietary nature of these systems often comes at a high cost, making the transition to open-source a logical progression for broader adoption and flexibility. DRM-Related Software: Solutions that involve digital rights management (DRM) mechanisms should be fully accessible. This would enable robust tracing of content and ensure that usage rights are respected and enforced accurately.Security and Transparency in Software Development
One of the most compelling reasons to transition closed-source software to open-source is the increased public scrutiny. This scrutiny can lead to a higher level of security, as more eyes observing the code can identify and address vulnerabilities that might otherwise remain unnoticed. Open-source projects can also receive more timely bug fixes and patches, thereby reducing the risk of security breaches.
Impact on Democracy and Governance
Another critical aspect to consider is the impact on government and public sector software. Voting systems, passport and driving license management, tax systems, and legal databases should be open-source to ensure transparency and public scrutiny. The absence of these systems being open-source means they are not subject to the same level of scrutiny, which can pose significant risks to democratic processes. Governing bodies and institutions should be held to account, and the code that drives their operations should be available for inspection.
Personal Data Rights and Model Transparency
Ultimately, the transition to open-source software should also extend to personal data and model transparency. For instance, companies should be required to not only disclose personal data upon request but also share the models related to that data in a form that can be applied or modified by the user. This could foster a more democratic and inclusive approach to data handling, empowering individuals to better understand and control their digital footprints.
Conclusion: A Call for Change
While it may seem like a lofty goal to bring closed-source software into the realm of FOSS, the benefits are clear. The move towards open-source can enhance security, promote transparency, and foster a more diverse and competitive software ecosystem. By advocating for these changes, we can ensure that the software we rely on is built on principles of openness and accountability.