Why the Indian Media Is Silent on the Rohingya Crisis

Why the Indian Media Is Silent on the Rohingya Crisis

Over the past several years, significant reporting on the Rohingya crisis has surfaced in the Australian press, highlighting the dire situation faced by the Rohingya people in Burma under the repressive regime. This includes concerns about the treatment of the Rohingya and the actions of Aung San Suu Kyi, who was once a Nobel Peace Prize winner despite her current stance on the Rohingya issue.

Despite the magnitude of this humanitarian tragedy, it is noteworthy that the Indian media has, for the most part, remained silent on the issue. There are several reasons for this silence, each revealing a different facet of the complex dynamics at play in India's media landscape.

The Entertainment Focus of Indian Media

One of the primary reasons for the lack of coverage is the overwhelming focus of Indian media on entertainment and more sensational stories. News cycles are often dominated by celebrity gossip, breaking Bollywood news, and other forms of entertainment. In a country where over a billion people are connected to the internet, there are numerous platforms like social media and streaming services that cater to the public's desire for entertainment. This focus on entertainment has left less room for in-depth coverage of global crises like the Rohingya situation.

Political Calculations and Media Lobbying

Another factor at play is the political calculations and lobbying efforts of political parties and government officials. India has a complex political landscape, and media outlets are often under pressure to align with the interests of the ruling party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The government's potential response to the Rohingya issue, particularly its deportation policies, adds a layer of complexity. Media outlets are hesitant to cover the crisis in a way that could be misconstrued as anti-government or anti-Modi, as this could have negative consequences for their editorial control and advertising revenue.

Ethics and Bias in Media Reporting

There is another layer of concern regarding the ethics and biases present in media reporting in India. Some media houses are known for producing propaganda and biased content, often favorable to the ruling government. Channels like Zee News and Republic TV have been criticized for fabricating stories and aligning with government policies. These outlets have sold their principles and humanitarian values, further stifling genuine reporting on issues like the Rohingya crisis.

Alternative Media Sources

For those seeking a more unbiased perspective, there are alternative media outlets available. Mirror Now, Ndtv, and Aaj Tak are some of the channels that have maintained a higher standard of journalism. These outlets are more likely to provide a balanced view and cover global issues that may not resonate with the local audience.

Global Perspective on the Rohingya Issue

While the lack of coverage in India is concerning, it is not unique to India. Other global media outlets, such as National Public Radio (NPR) in the United States, have also struggled to gain traction in covering the Rohingya issue. The connection to U.S. viewers may not be immediately apparent, making it challenging to generate interest and engagement.

In conclusion, the silence of the Indian media on the Rohingya crisis is a multifaceted issue. It is driven by a combination of entertainment focus, political calculations, and media ethics. However, there is a growing need for more responsible and comprehensive reporting on global issues to ensure that voices of the oppressed are heard.